description |
Refer to status reports important auction notice
source h. Fairtlough, Esq., collection sotheby’s in London on May 28, 1968, no. 167 London Bluett & Sons sotheby’s in London on March 14, 1972, no. 133 London Hugh Moss, Ltd
related information of this 盌 is yongle imperial kiln porcelain making model “, the shape of Juan xiuhe, blue and white strip and moving, highlighted the Chinese aesthetics of simplicity. device outside wall act the role of Chinese rose renshi opportunely, petals, convolute and soft petals shu, fang nu bursts. It s common bound branch lotus or peony grains, and take on the subject of Chinese rose. Throughout all previous dynasties porcelain grain, Chinese rose lines a rarity, I see a few yongle dynasty blue-and-white ware, reference sotheby’s in New York on March 20, 2018 a blue and white flowers and wen ling mouth tray (no. 108), dish heart with act the role of wind rose pattern. view the Chinese rose lines, line is changeable, petals, leaves hook, free and easy nature. Similar tangled branches flowers 盌 example, grain is relatively rigid, foot ring compose lotus-shaped lines, with this product, see adriano original bill temple, Tehran, Iran’s existing national museum, recorded in John Alexander Pope, “the Chinese Porcelains from the Ardebil school”, Washington, d.c., 1956, 48, chart with in three takashi min, the near east in Chinese porcelain, volume 3, Hong Kong, in 1981, no. A60. This flexible natural 盌 Chinese rose depict surrounded ring foot, or she, or serving, leafy, blowing in the wind, jiao yan all exhibit. Similar close case only is rare. Belong to h. Fairtlough Esq. Old Tibet, and the product in pairs,.compete sotheby’s auction sold in London in 1968, no. 166, sotheby’s in London on November 27, 1973, changed hands again, no. 134. John a. Pope couple also has A case after the repair, Chinese rose grain is relatively light, was exhibited in the Ming Blue – and – White: An Exhibition of Blue – decorated porcelain of the Ming dynasty “, art museum of Chicago, Chicago, 1949-1950, no. 42. |